Your peace of mind starts with clear legal strategy and responsive support—because your legal journey matters.

Supreme Court: Examination of One Attesting Witness is Mandatory to Prove Will under Section 68 Evidence Act

  • Home
  • Uncategorized
  • Supreme Court: Examination of One Attesting Witness is Mandatory to Prove Will under Section 68 Evidence Act

The Supreme Court has clarified that to prove a Will, it is mandatory under Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act to examine at least one attesting witness, regardless of whether the dispute involves contesting legal heirs.

A bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and Sandeep Mehta delivered this ruling in a case concerning a property dispute between two brothers.

Case Background

The plaintiff-respondent claimed ownership of the property based on a series of documents, including an Agreement to Sell, a General Power of Attorney, an affidavit, a receipt, and a registered Will executed by his father in 1996. He alleged that his brother, Ramesh Chand (defendant-appellant), was initially occupying the premises as a licensee but later sold a portion of the property to a third party without lawful authority.

The appellant, on the other hand, argued that the property had been orally gifted to him in 1973 and that he had been in possession ever since. He contested the validity of the plaintiff’s documents and sought a declaration of ownership.

The Delhi High Court, in its ruling, held that the failure to examine an attesting witness to the Will was not fatal, as the dispute did not involve contesting legal heirs and the appellant was claiming ownership through an independent oral transfer.

Supreme Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court disagreed with the High Court’s reasoning. Justice Aravind Kumar, authoring the judgment, observed:

“Section 68 does not create any exceptions based on who is opposing the Will or the nature of their claim. Its mandate applies universally to every Will that is brought before a court of law.”

The Court held that the examination of at least one attesting witness is an essential requirement and cannot be dispensed with simply because the dispute arises between non-legatees. It set aside the High Court’s observation that the requirement applies only when disputes arise among legal heirs.

Key Takeaway

The ruling reinforces that Section 68 of the Evidence Act applies uniformly to all cases where a Will is relied upon, ensuring the authenticity of such documents through mandatory attestation proof

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Terms


The Bar Council of India's regulations restrict Piolex Legal Solutions (the "Firm") from promoting or soliciting business. The user agrees that: This website is only intended to provide the user with information about the Firm, its practice areas, and its consultants; There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any kind from the Firm or any of its members to solicit any work or advertise through this website. The user specifically seeks more information about the firm for his or her own information and professional or personal use, and any information accessed or materials downloaded are done so at the user's own risk. The use of this website does not create any Client-lawyer relationship between the Firm and the User.

The information on this website is not intended to be used as a means of advertisement or solicitation, and nothing on it should be taken to be legal advice in any manner.

The Firm is not responsible for any outcomes of actions made by users who depend on the content or information on this website.

This website's content is the Firm's intellectual property.

This will close in 11 seconds