Your peace of mind starts with clear legal strategy and responsive support—because your legal journey matters.

Month: September 2026

Mere Absence Of Train Ticket Cannot Defeat Railway Compensation Claim: Supreme Court Reiterates

The Supreme Court has reiterated that the mere absence of a railway ticket from an accident victim cannot, by itself, be a ground to reject a claim for compensation. The Court observed that where the claimant

Read More

Tender Eligibility Dispute Can’t Be Treated As Fraud To Blacklist Contractor: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that a contractor cannot be blacklisted merely because there is a genuine dispute or misunderstanding regarding the interpretation of tender eligibility conditions. The Court observed that where the issue is

Read More

Need ‘Civilised’ Celebrations: Bombay High Court Bans Firecrackers, Laser Lights In Religious Processions; Directs ₹1 Lakh Deposit, Prosecution

The Bombay High Court has imposed strict restrictions on noise and air pollution during religious processions and festive celebrations across Maharashtra. The Court has directed a complete ban on bursting firecrackers on public streets and roads,

Read More

Patient Forced To Buy Stents From Private Shop Due To Unavailability At Govt Hospital Entitled To Full Reimbursement: Rajasthan High Court

The Rajasthan High Court has held that a patient who undergoes treatment at a government hospital and is compelled to purchase required stents from a private supplier because the stents are unavailable at the government hospital

Read More

₹2,700 Cancer Medicine Sold At MRP Of ₹27,000: Supreme Court Flags Huge Price Gap And Questions Drug Pricing System

The Supreme Court has expressed serious concern over the wide difference between the Price to Retailer (PTR) and the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of essential medicines, particularly cancer drugs. A Bench of Justice Vikram Nath and

Read More

Principal Employer Not Liable To Pay Gratuity To Contractual Workmen; Controlling Authority Can’t Decide Who Must Pay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a principal employer cannot be made liable to pay gratuity to workers engaged through a contractor when there is no employer-employee relationship between the principal employer and the contractual workers.

Read More

Father Lacking Moral Support From Son Who Acquires His Property Can’t Claim Maintenance U/S 125 CrPC Unless Destitute: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order directing a son to pay ₹75,000 per month as maintenance to his 80-year-old father, observing that the absence of moral or family support in old age cannot,

Read More

PC Act | Handover Of Bribe To Intermediary Not Enough To Prove Public Servant’s Guilt: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that merely proving that bribe money was handed over by a complainant to an intermediary who claimed to be acting on behalf of a public servant is not, by itself, sufficient

Read More

Using Visually Similar Vernacular Version Of Registered Trademark Amounts To Infringement: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that using a vernacular-language version of a registered trademark can amount to trademark infringement when the mark is phonetically and visually similar to the original registered mark. Justice K. Kumaresh

Read More

Bombay High Court Denies Custody To Biological Parents Of 11-Yr-Old Living With Neighbours Since Infancy, Says Child Showed ‘Indifference’

The Bombay High Court has refused to transfer the interim custody of an 11-year-old girl to her biological parents, after finding that the child had been living with the respondent and his wife since infancy and

Read More

Terms


The Bar Council of India's regulations restrict Piolex Legal Solutions (the "Firm") from promoting or soliciting business. The user agrees that: This website is only intended to provide the user with information about the Firm, its practice areas, and its consultants; There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any kind from the Firm or any of its members to solicit any work or advertise through this website. The user specifically seeks more information about the firm for his or her own information and professional or personal use, and any information accessed or materials downloaded are done so at the user's own risk. The use of this website does not create any Client-lawyer relationship between the Firm and the User.

The information on this website is not intended to be used as a means of advertisement or solicitation, and nothing on it should be taken to be legal advice in any manner.

The Firm is not responsible for any outcomes of actions made by users who depend on the content or information on this website.

This website's content is the Firm's intellectual property.

This will close in 11 seconds