The Supreme Court of India refused to interfere with the establishment of Vantara, observing that once animals are lawfully imported and housed in a facility, disturbing or relocating them may itself amount to cruelty.
Key Observations
The Court noted that animals brought into a controlled environment for care, conservation, or rehabilitation should not be unnecessarily disturbed.
It emphasized that any interference which affects the well-being of such animals could violate animal welfare laws.
The Bench found no illegality in the process of import or maintenance of the animals at the facility.
Court’s Stand
The plea challenging the project was rejected, with the Court observing that animal welfare must be assessed holistically, including the impact of relocation or disruption.
It stressed that actions taken in the name of welfare should not inadvertently harm the animals.
Legal Principle
Even well-intentioned interference with animals, if it causes stress or harm after lawful import, may amount to cruelty under law.
